Antiterrorusts's Blog

Identifying with anti-terrorUSt$ reflects my personal politics. While I am not, have never been or likely ever shall be a militant, I abhor the past and current history of terrorUSts in general, terrorUSt$ specifically. What is the difference between the two terms? All terrorUSt$ are terrorUSts, but not all terrorUSts are terrorUSt$. All terrorUSts are terrorists, but not all terrorists are terrorUSts. Considering the last two centuries of the previous four centuries of genocide in what has become the United States of America: from a Native American’s viewpoint, it is terrorUSt$ who would have government forces cleanse Native American lands of “the enemy”, i.e. indigenous peoples.

Upon genocide —militant intimidation, spiritual and physical rape, racial and religious elitism/persecution/fascism, slavery, murder— , deceit, ignorance, arrogance and thievery/privitUSization of land, waters, air and Space resources was founded, is being sustained the wealth of the United States, an empire trillion$ in arrears toward the financial maintenance of imperialUSt$ dreams… the humanely moral and spiritual maintenance of those dreams never in doubt,,, they were so deficient as to be effectively absent from the very beginning.

_humane : marked or motivated by concern with the alleviation of suffering; showing evidence of moral and intellectual advancement_

There is no mistaking the similarity between the fascist mentality of nazi Germany and the fascUSt mentality (e.g., Tea Party) of the United States, or more generally, USrael when one includes Israel (e.g., Likud Party). When taking away from history the holocaustic evidence of the reign of nazi Germany in Europe, one would be left to understand Naziizm mostly through reading and hearing only the rhetoric of the ruling power, expressed best through the mouths and slogans of that supportive segment of those over whom they rule. In the U.S. such a segment worships the myths of militarUSt$ capitalUSt (including Israel, it becomes zionUSt$) ideology … this election cycle in the U.S. that segment is called The Teabaggers** .

As for the so-called “The Holocaust”, while the factual horror of the Nazi-generated mid-20th Century holocaust is beyond comprehension, beyond question, so to is the holocaust perpetrated on Armenians by the government of Turkey at the beginning of the past century. What got into some Turks in order for them to believe they could “remove”, or otherwise exterminate from the land thousands of families and their kin and not just get away with it, but profit from it? Could not the Turks and then Hitler (not to mention zionists in Palestine) have viewed the morality (or lack thereof) of the U.S. treatment** of Native Americans to be the standard on which to model the morality of their own nationalist, militarist domestic policies and wealth care systems? And now, in the beginning of yet another Christian century, how positively absurd is it that the U.S. Congress exercise a vote by a Congressional committee condemning the deaths of up to 1.5 million Armenians during as “genocide” when the U.S. has effectively ignored its own genocidal history of thievery?

Expecting that the religiously, politically loaded term “The Holocaust” become unquestionably part of others’ vocabulary, else others can justifiably be deemed to be haters of Jews, conforms to currently ‘politically correct’ US dogma, but it escapes sound reasoning and objectivity.

** “The Beggars” they are for their practice of ‘begging the question‘ For example, when the question/point at issue is “Should the G. W. Bush Gang be prosecuted for crimes against humanity?”, a Teabagger prefers to respond with “Let’s start with Obama! Let’s prosecute him for crimes against humanity?”

***Andrew Jackson: 7th U.S. President, almost singlehandedly responsible for initiating a Final Solution being applied to Native Americans on an industrial scale; and, ironically perhaps, the first U.S. president to send a trade commissioner to Turkey, unbeknownst to Congress.

i am not all familiar with this site so will cop/ paste an original writing for an initial trial post. The post’s content (not this post but the one immediately following this one) is not all all meant to be inflammatory but depending on the hates and fears of its reader it has certainly elicited some hateful remarks elsewhere. So we’ll just see what manner of response the subject might create here.